Comments on: 150 iPhones per minute http://joemaller.com/789/150-per-minute/ .com Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:14:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Patrick http://joemaller.com/789/150-per-minute/#comment-22419 Patrick Mon, 30 Jul 2007 21:28:50 +0000 http://joemaller.com/2007/07/25/150-per-minute/#comment-22419 Yes Joe, I should have done some googling myself. These kinds of lawsuits piss me off too. FWIW, like I said, my cell phone (my first) has lasted 3 years now. Does the battery perform "as well" as it did 3 years ago? No. Only one time did I notice a significant drop in performance (and that was just for one day. I can not imagine that Apple would ship a product with a battery technology that could doom its reputation. I think Apple is a fantastic company (as far as stock goes) but I do not like the volatility that goes with things like a partnership like the one with AT&T Yes Joe, I should have done some googling myself. These kinds of lawsuits piss me off too.

FWIW, like I said, my cell phone (my first) has lasted 3 years now. Does the battery perform “as well” as it did 3 years ago? No. Only one time did I notice a significant drop in performance (and that was just for one day. I can not imagine that Apple would ship a product with a battery technology that could doom its reputation.

I think Apple is a fantastic company (as far as stock goes) but I do not like the volatility that goes with things like a partnership like the one with AT&T

]]> By: Joe http://joemaller.com/789/150-per-minute/#comment-22265 Joe Sat, 28 Jul 2007 01:19:11 +0000 http://joemaller.com/2007/07/25/150-per-minute/#comment-22265 Pat, even if your wife's uncle had bought AAPL at the worst possible time in the month before the iPhone launch ($125.09 on June 18), he'd have still cleared a solid 15% return as of today, even with the markets currently in freefall. Had he bought at the best possible time ($117.50 on June 13), he would have realized a 22% return as of today. About the battery. Well that class action suit pissed me off enough that I'm responding as a full post: <a href='http://joemaller.com/2007/07/28/iphone-battery-nonsense-round-2/' rel="nofollow">iPhone battery nonsense, round 2</a> Pat, even if your wife’s uncle had bought AAPL at the worst possible time in the month before the iPhone launch ($125.09 on June 18), he’d have still cleared a solid 15% return as of today, even with the markets currently in freefall. Had he bought at the best possible time ($117.50 on June 13), he would have realized a 22% return as of today.

About the battery. Well that class action suit pissed me off enough that I’m responding as a full post: iPhone battery nonsense, round 2

]]> By: Patrick http://joemaller.com/789/150-per-minute/#comment-22251 Patrick Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:55:29 +0000 http://joemaller.com/2007/07/25/150-per-minute/#comment-22251 Apparently you can only charge the battery about 300 times before having to PAY THEM to professionally replace it. My own cell phone is now 3 years old, and I have not yet had to replace either it or the battery (phew). http://blogs.business2.com/apple/2007/07/iphone-class-ac.html Apparently you can only charge the battery about 300 times before having to PAY THEM to professionally replace it. My own cell phone is now 3 years old, and I have not yet had to replace either it or the battery (phew).

http://blogs.business2.com/apple/2007/07/iphone-class-ac.html

]]> By: Patrick http://joemaller.com/789/150-per-minute/#comment-22249 Patrick Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:04 +0000 http://joemaller.com/2007/07/25/150-per-minute/#comment-22249 I feel somewhat vindicated now. My wife's uncle was seriously contemplating purchasing Apple stock, simply based on the iPhone buzz surrounding the launch weekend. I advised him against it for the mere reason that Apple stock is now permanently welded to that of AT&T Wireless' performance. The fact that they activated only 60% of what was sold is a signal of something bad. I feel somewhat vindicated now. My wife’s uncle was seriously contemplating purchasing Apple stock, simply based on the iPhone buzz surrounding the launch weekend. I advised him against it for the mere reason that Apple stock is now permanently welded to that of AT&T Wireless’ performance. The fact that they activated only 60% of what was sold is a signal of something bad.

]]>