On the Gizmodo-iPhone Kerfuffle
Pat emailed asking about the Gizmodo-iPhone imbroglio, my reply turned into this post.
Here’s the backstory, The Tale of Apple’s Next iPhone. Gizmodo’s cheekiness takes on a whole other dimension in light of where this story has gone.
- Journalist shield laws exist to protect journalists, not to grant journalists carte blanche to break laws. Everyone knew this was shady, Jason Chen and Gizmodo are reaping what they’ve sown.
- The story that the prototype iPhone was “found” is entirely hearsay, reported by persons with demonstrably questionable ethics.
- If the transaction is determined to be a crime, the $5000 price tag probably made that crime a felony.
- The police raid on Chen’s home made me really uncomfortable. It seems excessively heavy handed and REACT’s appearance of collusion with Apple shouldn’t be dismissed. (Don’t fault Apple; do fault California) I felt especially bad for Chen’s wife, whose home was invaded and whose computer was most likely also confiscated.
- And yet, in context, this was really funny.
- Gizmodo’s decision to publish Gray Powell’s name and photo was wrong and among the biggest jerk-moves I’ve ever seen. It served no purpose other than public humiliation. (Karma’s a bitch)
- I will be surprised if Gizmodo ever gets press credentials to another Apple Event.
- The guy who “found” the iPhone is a moron. Yay, $5000 and a probable criminal investigation. Well played.
Gourmet House Staudt is less than 20 miles from 1 Infinite Loop, there’s a 50-50 chance the guy lived between Apple and the beer garden. If it were me — well, if it were me I would have left the phone with the bartender — but if it were me and for some reason the phone came home with me, I would have driven it to Apple HQ and returned it personally. Who knows, maybe Steve Jobs would have even offered a personal thank you for doing the right thing.
Update: Wired found him.
