Joe Maller.com

iPhone two-way video prototype

The Ecamm brothers got two-way video conferencing working between two iPhones. As good as I think the iPhone is now, just wait a few months when this thing is really broken open. (link via Buzz @ C4)

I don’t know why I’ve waited this long (ok I do, my life has a density), I’m jailbreaking my phone tonight.

Share |

link: Aug 12, 2007 3:44 pm
posted in: Apple Mac OS X
Tags:

iPhone battery nonsense, round 2

So some attention-deprived class action lawyers are suing Apple because of a false statement about iPhone batteries that appeared in a sensationalist article a few weeks ago. Patrick commented on my previous post with a link to a Business 2.0 posting about this. I’m sure it’ll be all over the press in the coming days.

Gizmodo summed this up perfectly with “dumbtastically stupid.” That phrase could also apply to Business 2.0, but would need a few other clauses added to cover petty, wrong and dull. Oh, and broke. And clueless. Reinforcing all of that, this bit of the Business 2.0 posting stood out as just pathetic:

My memory is not what it used to be, but I seem to recall that it wasn’t until after the iPhone went on sale that Apple issued a formal description of how many times the battery could be recharged before it might need replacement, in which case there might be something to the complaint.

Philip Elmer-DeWitt, you are getting paid to blog, how hard is it to use Google? Or, you know, just remember something that was a huge stink in the area you cover professionally just two and a half weeks ago? You are paid to blog. Find the damn link. Here: Apple – Batteries – iPhone.

Apple’s battery page clearly states:

A properly maintained iPhone battery is designed to retain up to 80% of its original capacity at 400 full charge and discharge cycles. You may choose to replace your battery when it no longer holds sufficient charge to meet your needs.

I’m pretty sure this all started with Kent German and Donald Bell’s original iPhone review for CNET, also published by CNN:

Unfortunately, the Phone does not have a battery that a user can replace. That means you have to send the iPhone to Apple to replace the battery after it’s spent (Apple is estimating one battery will keep its full strength for 400 charges–probably about three years’ worth of use).

That slightly misleading paragraph, which implies the battery will be spent after 400 cycles, first echoed by Gizmodo, was later breathlessly parroted and made more dire by MSNBC’s Bob Sullivan:

The iPhone battery will only survive about 300-400 recharges, the company says.

Well that’s just completely wrong. Bob seemingly didn’t bother to check his facts against the original source. Gizmodo at least had the good sense to recant. John Gruber of Daring Fireball named Sullivan Jackass of the Week, the title could have gone to any number of people.

Apple has sold over 100 million iPods, none of those have had user-replaceable batteries. That obviously hasn’t stopped what seems like every fourth person on the sidewalk from buying and using iPods.

Frankly, I doubt most people ever change the battery on their cell phones and Apple discovered this during market research. I don’t ever recall doing so with my RAZR, for the most part I just charged that POS every night. I had a spare for my previous LG, but never used it. The iPhone’s fixed battery was most likely a well-founded design consideration reinforced by the unmitigated success of the sealed-battery iPod.

This whole mess should have been pretty much dealt with a few weeks ago. Jason Snell thoroughly covered this in MacWorld back on July 12th. Yet I was talking with a friend about the iPhone earlier this week and she brought up the 300 charges number.

No one ever sees corrections in the news. If a story gets in the paper, no matter how wrong, people will believe it and very few will ever find out that the truth was largely contradictory.

Share |

link: Jul 28, 2007 12:35 am
posted in: Apple
Tags:

150 iPhones per minute

During their quarterly conference call Apple stated they sold 270,000 iPhones in the first 30 hours. That’s somewhere between $75,000 to $90,000 each minute. Apple’s stock punched through $150 after hours and was still trading over $148 when I published this.

The day prior, AT&T claimed activation of 146,000 iPhones over the first two days. That figure seemed very low and the news duly tanked Apple’s stock.

Another way of reading those numbers is that AT&T botched 124,000 activations. Considering my own iPhone activation experience and that of many friends, this seems very possible. Thankfully things have been flawless since.


iPhone and the non-deleting email

I’ve seen this happen a few times, an email message just will not delete. Clicking the trash can shows the message delete animation, but the message just reappears behind the animation. The same thing happens in list view. The solution is to reboot the phone, everything should be fine after a restart.

To reboot the phone, hold the wake button for several seconds. A slider will come up asking you to power off. Shut it down, wait a second or two and then press wake to turn it back on. Your email should work normally.

I’ve found rebooting every few days is a good way to clear any slightly odd behavior or minor slowdowns. iPhone is a 1.0 release and these are software bugs. I’m confident they’ll be fixed in a future update.

Update: Force-quitting Mail can also help. To force-quit any iPhone application, just hold the home button for about 10 seconds, until the home screen displays.


iPhone vs. Apple Mail

I’ve been seeing an issue with Apple Mail affecting several iPhone users on a several different of hosts:

  • With a POP account, Apple’s Mail.app will ask for the password repeatedly, refuse the correct password and fail to collect any mail.
  • With IMAP, the account seems to stall and does not necessarily update state or download new messages. Desktop IMAP behavior is particularly erratic.

In both cases, the iPhone continues to work just fine. The problems mostly affects users who’ve set their iPhone to Auto-Check for mail to something other than Manual. The following lines appear in the Desktop’s console.log almost immediately after setting the iPhone to auto-check for mail:

2007-07-05 15:33:17.190 Mail[21242] Unhandled response to command SELECT: * NO  Trying to get mailbox lock from process 28292
2007-07-05 15:34:24.098 Mail[21242] Unhandled response to command SELECT: * NO  Trying to get mailbox lock from process 29790
2007-07-05 15:36:14.917 Mail[21242] Unhandled response to command SELECT: * NO  Trying to get mailbox lock from process 31080

Those entries seem to indicate that the IMAP server is sending a response that Apple Mail doesn’t know what to do with.

A thread on the MacRumors forums claimed this was a multiple connections issue with the mail server, but I think I’ve conclusively debunked that, at least for IMAP.

To test the multiple connection theory, I set up Thunderbird on two other physical machines, one Mac and a Dell running Ubuntu, then set up my account using the default IMAP settings. I also opened my account in Horde webmail and hit reload a lot. Despite those simultaneous connections, Apple Mail seemed to be fine and messages were getting delivered. The little progress indicator was, however, still sitting there next to the account name, not spinning.

So now I can break Apple Mail just by turning on Auto-Check in iPhone’s Settings->Mail. Manual checking from the iPhone doesn’t cause any problems. So far I’m only seeing this on shared hosts running the Courier mail server.

IMAP is inconsistent about when it breaks, maybe relating related to server load issue. POP will break every time: If I check my email on a POP account with the iPhone, Apple Mail will immediately ask for and then refuse the password for that account.

An IMAP workaround

Installing IMAP-IDLE, pretty much fixes the problems with IMAP. I’ve had this running for several hours and the iPhone checking every 15 minutes, and things seem to be working smoothly. IMAP errors still appear in console.log but mail is getting through. I’m going to install this on a few other machines tomorrow and see what happens.

Not sure what to do about POP, but then we’re migrating everyone over to IMAP anyway.


iPhone: The end of the beginning

I should trust myself more. The solution turned out to be exactly what I thought it was; choosing “replace existing phone with this iPhone.” The words are from memory and I hope to never see those activation screens again. It was either that or laying myself prostrate at the feet of Fake Steve Jobs.

After 67 hours, all eight of the iPhones I know of are finally working.

AT&T wasn’t ready. Getting all our phones activated took an absurd amount of time and effort. Giving AT&T some credit, the people they have answering the phones are very good, even if they weren’t given all the tools they needed to really help. Also, considering the overwhelming number of problems, AT&T pulled off a miracle getting so many resolved by Monday. (Small percentage of users my butt)

The iPhone itself is astonishing. This is truly a transformative device.

Share |

link: Jul 02, 2007 3:59 pm
posted in: Apple
Tags:

iPhone activation hell, day 4

Ugh. Apparently my account was set up correctly — everywhere but here. I was just told that number has transferred and the account is set up correctly. Except that my iPhone has no idea it’s connected to anything.

Cathy in Jackson was the first person I’ve talked to who really seemed to get this thing on it’s way to working. I’m now fully escalated, forms have been filled out and I’ve been instructed to cycle power on the phone regularly for the next few hours. And she’s going to call me back later today.

I’m feeling like this might finally be straightened out today.

If I had any advice, I’d say to call the main AT&T number, 877-419-4500, and ask to be escalated to the iPhone fallout number. Yes, “fallout.” Have them verify that the SIM card is working correctly, and go from there.

At this point I’d try animal sacrifice if there was the slightest chance it would work.

Share |
1 Comment so far
link: Jul 02, 2007 9:49 am
posted in: Apple
Tags:


« Previous PageNext Page »