Joe Maller.com

Excuse, justification or transparency

As I type this, Noemi is sleeping on my chest. Michelle is back at work full time and for the summer I’m taking care of the girls. Noemi five days a week, Lila and Noemi three days a week. When Noemi’s a little bit older she’ll join Lila on babysitter days. So until school starts again I’m doing my best to cram working time in between full-time daddy duties.

FCP 5 broke my FXScript compiler and I haven’t had a chance to fix it yet. While fixing it, I’m also porting it to AppleScript Studio, since that satisfies a near term and long term goal simultaneously. Once that is functional, which should be soon depending on available time (of which writing this is taking away from) I’ll release an updated beta of Joe’s Filters which will remove watermarks for registered users.

There’s plenty of other stuff dragging on me as well which I don’t want to waste time enumerating. Identifying demands helps a lot, but it’s still frustrating how long it takes to get anything done and how tired I am at night.

Share |

link: Jul 12, 2005 4:50 pm
posted in: misc.

Links for June 24, 2005


iPhoto Color Shift Bug, identified?

I got an email this morning asking if I knew anything about the iPhoto color shifting issue with edited images. I hadn’t been paying much attention to this while working on other stuff, but once I looked for the problem it it was very apparent and troubling.

Based on a lot of good information in the MacInTouch iPhoto Report, a massive thread on Apple Discussions and my own experience with Apple’s image manipulation tools, I think I’ve found the basis of this bug. James Bailey’s observation on MacInTouch specifically identifies the problem:

Using Photoshop 7.0 to help diagnose this, here is what seems to be happening. My original photo seems to have an embedded ColorSync profile of sRGB IEC61966-2.1. […] Opening the duplicated and cropped photo I do not get the same warning which means that Photoshop thinks the embedded color profile is now ColorSync RGB – Generic RGB Profile for the new file. [emphasis added]

That describes exactly what I’m seeing.

SIPS, Apple’s Scriptable Image Processing System offers tools for working with images and manipulating things like ICC color profiles. I have two photos, DSC04737.JPG and DSC04737_1.JPG, the second is a duplicate of the first with a few lines cropped off the bottom to trigger the color change.

When opened in Photoshop, I see the following Color Management warnings:
DSC04737.JPG
Embedded: sRGB IEC1966-2.1

DSC04737_1.JPG
Embedded: Generic RGB Profile

However, when checking with SIPS, I see this:

$ sips -g profile DSC04737.JPG
profile: Generic RGB Profile

$ sips -g profile DSC04737_1.JPG
profile: Generic RGB Profile

SIPS appears to wrongly identify the embedded profile in the original image, believing it is Generic RGB. It gets slightly more interesting, and confirms another suspicion of mine: With 10.3.9, SIPS can’t find a profile in the unmodified image and returns the following:

$ sips -g profile DSC04737.JPG
profile: <nil>

$ sips --extractProfile profiledump.icc DSC04737.JPG
Error: No profile in image

At this point I’m comfortable pointing to the underlying ColorSync foundations updated in 10.4 as the culprit. (These are used by SIPS and presumably by iPhoto too, despite iPhoto’s unique EXIF parsing engine, the foundations are meant to be used throughout the system.) My only hesitation is whether or not this problem appears on 10.3.x after installing QT7.

Comparing the two images without color management in Photoshop shows that the image is permanently changed. Unfortunately, this means that whatever caused the conversion applied a lossy correction to all pixel values. While there is the potential to somewhat reverse this problem with some profile voodoo and dumb luck, the result would be twice shifted and especially prone to visible artifacting and posterization.

Based on the above, I’m guessing that when iPhoto reads the originals, it wrongly interprets the files before applying changes to it. This would mean the modified files are ruined before iPhoto’s adjustments are even applied.

If I were feeling especially adventurous and had lots more time, I might try replacing all or some of the ColorSync frameworks with versions from 10.3.9. I’d find the files to replace here:

/System/Library/Frameworks/
ApplicationServices.framework/Versions/
A/Frameworks/ColorSync.framework
/Versions/A/

Of course I’d be doing that at my own risk, with the knowledge that I could render my computer unbootable and only with a full backup ready to go. But it is an interesting theory and I wonder if anyone’s tried it yet.

Rumor has it that this is all fixed in 10.4.2. (update: not fixed


Real Advertising War Stories at The One Club

NYC Creative Director leaves clients and staff in NYC, moves to Kabul to help establish the first communication agency in the country since before the Taliban. Is she a sadist, uniquely qualified for the task, or simply and blindly optimistic?

On June 21 at 7 pm in The One Club Gallery, Sharoz Makarechi of Think Tank 3, recently back from the trenches, will share advertising stories from war-torn Afghanistan and discuss the value of ideas, cross media thinking, and creative communication campaigns in a society struggling to recover from over 25 years of war.

That would be my friend Sharoz. It’s hard to put into words how much I respect and admire her courage. I feel lucky to know such an exceptional person.

Update: Kabob!


Links for June 15, 2005


Links for June 4, 2005


Rumor overdrive

So the WWDC rumor mill just went into turbo-super-maximum overdrive.

CNET: Apple to ditch IBM, switch to Intel chips

Yeah, CNET is supposed to be pretty legit, as these things go. As would be expected, the MacRumors forums are abuzz, most interesting speculation is that Intel starts making a PPC-style CPU.

An ironic point, if true: Apple will be running on Intel. Microsoft will be running on IBM G5s. (OK, a sorta G5-ish tri-core CPU)

Not sure what to make of any of this. Mac-Intel rumors have been around forever. The technology isn’t really an issue, between OSX’s hardware abstraction and Apple’s excellent development tools, most apps should be able to migrate in a reasonable amount of time. The bigger problem is inventory and future sales. Who’s going to buy a dead-end computer? If everyone knows they’re switching chips (and if they do announce this, everyone will know), the hit on existing inventory and interim sales would be astronomical. If this is true, I hope they have a lot of cash in the bank.

How would the market react? Bump Apple up huge on the news until calmer heads point out the sales hit? Shares fall immediately based on the sales hit but recover to higher levels after a few months? Apple got hammered on Friday because of rumors of too much inventory, I really need to find a way to get quotes on my phone via SMS.
Whatever happens, I’m getting really psyched for the keynote.

Share |

link: Jun 03, 2005 11:41 pm
posted in: misc.


« Previous PageNext Page »