Thoughts on Ideological Gardens
Over the past few months I’ve been forming something of a theory on mass hysteria and how the sudden rise of interconnectivity on a global scale has distorted opinions and led to many instances of closed thought and conclusions based on incomplete data sets.
One example that came to mind this afternoon was how it’s now possible to exist entirely inside of one ideology. Everything one reads can originate from a like ideology. This is more possible than ever because of the way information coagulates online. Blogs with similar beliefs link to one another, social networks and influence leaders create balkanized communities. These communities exist as thought-overlays across society, ignoring geographic boundaries.
Another byproduct is the ability to organize gatherings and protests on a scale unimaginable to those limited by a printing press or xerox machine. A few years ago flashmobs were regularly gathering hundreds of people at random locations with virtually no advance notice. Apply that same principle to any given political cause and you end up with demonstrations orders of magnitude larger than anything before. The organizers of those causes then believe their mission and themselves to be significantly more right than their predecessors. This builds on the first idea too, those same organizers existing wholly within their self-selected ideological gardens, seeing anything beyond their walls as a threat or evidence of their own self-righteousness.
What we’re most at risk of losing is the ability to understand and rationally challenge dissenting views.
Humanity as a whole wasn’t really ready for what the Internet and global connectivity has given us. But one of the great lessons of history is that humanity is never ready, we always get blind-sided by advances and then cobble together a future from the leftover shards of what once was.




